Friday, July 31, 2009

Guest Post at As Usual, I Need More Bookshelves

Elizabeth over at As Usual, I Need More Bookshelves has a fantastic weekly guest posting series called 451 Fridays. Today was my turn! You can see my post here.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Rosie's Riveters: Carrie & Margaret Pole

Rosie's Riveters is a weekly posting written by Booklust readers about riveting females in literature. Many readers have strong reactions to the women in the books they read- either very positive or very negative. These are the characters we find riveting, for good reasons or bad ones, and they form the population of Rosie's Riveters. Through this weekly post, we can discuss females we love to hate, or love to love. And maybe, just maybe- we can determine why we react so strongly to them.

If you
are interested in participating, please comment on this post or e-mail me and I'll add you to the line-up!

This week's post is by my good bookblog friend Carrie, who writes at My Middle Name is Patience. Her blog centers mainly around knitting, but she also throws in monthly blurbs on the books she's read recently, giving just enough information to reel you in and want to read the good ones! Carrie also is a very kind and thoughtful blogger. She comments quite often on blogs she follows, and she always replies to comments I leave on her blog as well. It's nice :-) So, here's Carrie!


Who is your Riveter?
Margaret Pole, 8th Countess of Salisbury.


What book does she feature in?

Richard III, William Shakespeare (a bit part)
Hazel Pierce, March 2003, Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury,
1473–1541 - Loyalty, Lineage and Leadership

(Wikipedia says that Kate O'Toole plays a part loosely based on her in
the Showtime series, The Tudors.)

Do you love her or hate her?

I mostly admire her.

Can you compare her to a celebrity?
Probably but naturally no one comes to mind. Who has that kind of power
and connections in this day and age?


What makes her riveting?
Her birthday is the same date as mine, August 14th. Well. She was born
some 500 years earlier, give or take a few. (1473). (What, that isn't
enough? lol)

But truly, what makes her riveting is her lineage, longevity and life.
She was the Duke of Clarence's daughter (the brother of Edward IV and
Richard III that was drowned in a vat of wine) and had a better claim to
the throne than any the Tudors. In fact, when Catherine of Aragon came
to England to marry Prince Arthur as a teenage girl, Henry VII had her
brother (who had been in the Tower since he was a young boy) executed.


What do you most admire/despise about her?
I admire that despite that fact, she was a good friend to Catherine,a
godmother and equally good friend to Catherine and Henry VIII's daughter
Mary; married and apparently happily to a lowborn friend of Henry VII,
who not coincidentally, chose him as her husband. When her husband died,
she never did remarry but was one of the very, very few autonomous land
owning women of that era. She did rely on her sons somewhat but she
ruled her estates (which were considerable) for years.


The remains of Warblington Castle, The Countess of Salisbury's main seat


In fact, that's how she came to her terrible end. Henry VIII wanted some of her
properties. She fought him off for 15 years and between being a thorn in
his side denying him what he wanted (not something Henry took to well),
her lineage was a direct threat to his dynasty. Edward was a boy and
Mary and Elizabeth? Ever to reign as Queens? Unlikely.

On May 27th, 1541,at the age of 67, Henry VIII had her beheaded. And it
wasn't done well either.

Would you recommend reading the book in which the Riveter features?
I would! Hazel Pierce's book about Margaret Pole is a fascinating focus
on a woman who wielded so much power for her time and managed to survive
the odds against her. Well, for quite some time. Margaret Pole appears
in countless other historical novels and non fiction but more as a
supporting character with a brief mention with good reason, the woman
was connected. An in depth look at her life is pretty illuminating from
a historical perspective and frankly, helped me sort out who was who
back then a bit better.

Any parting remarks?
Ah, the question direct. Why does that give me such a brain freeze?
Other than adding that she's a Catholic Martyr (beatified in 1886) and
she's just one of many riveting women in history, nothing comes to mind.
Thank you for this opportunity, Aarti! It's been a pleasure to be
introduced (or reacquainted with) so many fascinating women.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Review: The Lieutenant

Title: The Lieutenant

Author: Kate Grenville

Publisher: Atlantic Monthly Books

# of Pages: 307

Favorite Line: "But she had shown him the existence of the man he could be."

Rating: 8/10

This review is based on an advance reader's edition.

Product Description

A stunning follow-up to her Commonwealth Writers’ Prize-winning book, The Secret River, Grenville’s The Lieutenant is a gripping story about friendship, self-discovery, and the power of language set along the unspoiled shores of 1788 New South Wales. As a boy, Daniel Rooke was an outsider. Ridiculed in school and misunderstood by his parents, Daniel could only hope that he would one day find his place in life. When he joins the marines and travels to Australia as a lieutenant on the First Fleet, Daniel finally sees his chance for a new beginning. As his countrymen struggle to control their cargo of convicts and communicate with nearby Aboriginal tribes, Daniel constructs an observatory to chart the stars and begin the work he prays will make him famous. But the place where they have landed will prove far more revelatory than the night sky. Out on his isolated point, Daniel comes to intimately know the local Aborigines and forges a remarkable connection with one girl that will change the course of his life. The Lieutenant is a remarkable story about the poignancy of a friendship that defies linguistic and cultural barriers, and shows one man that he is capable of exceptional courage.

I think I have gone on and on about my love of Kate Grenville's The Secret River several times before. It is one of my all-time favorite books, not only for the plot and the characters, but for Grenville's complete mastery over the English language. She knows how to wield it and wind it and make it magical. Part of the excitement of opening a new book, for me, is in the hopes of discovering an author like Grenville, who can take my breath away with her writing.

The Lieutenant centers around the same theme as The Secret River- the colonization of Australia by the British, and the subsequent race relations between the British and the natives, the struggles of conscience many people faced. She approaches this topic, always, in a manner that manages to be sympathetic to both sides. I think this is probably a very hard line to walk, so she is deserving of praise for it. Her language in this book is just as remarkable as it is in The Secret River- she uses such simple words, really, but she uses them so well. I don't know how she does it, but I wish that I could.

Somehow, though, this story did not have the same magic for me that The Secret River did. I did not feel as emotionally invested in the characters. That's not to say that Daniel Rooke is not a commendable and admirable person, or that he wasn't fleshed out enough. He was- there was just something slightly flat about him to me. And I don't think I ever got to know any of the other characters well enough to warm to them, though I certainly had strong feelings about several of them. The spark, though, did not ignite into a flame.

This book is actually shorter than it seems- I read it pretty quickly, and I don't think I was rushing at all to finish it. I think Grenville spends more time on Rooke's life before he reaches Australia, and so the time he is in Australia seems truncated in comparison. And the way she ends the book is bewildering to me- I don't think we know enough of the man throughout the rest of the story to be able to make the leap she does at the end of it. Rooke disappointed me as a character after the complexity of William Thornhill in The Secret River. I think she could have developed him more and made the story a bit longer to give readers a better read on him.

I did enjoy reading this book, and I would recommend it to anyone interested in Australian history and race relations. But I would much, much more highly recommend The Secret River. It is fantastic.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Characters I Hate

Court over at Once Upon a Bookshelf started a list of characters in literature she hates, after doing her Rosie's Riveters post here. Kelly took it up at The Written World, and now I decided to do it, too. Why? Because I like to be negative and catty :-)

It's only fair, though, that I balance the scales and do a list of characters I love, too. That will be done at some point in the future but not right now. I'm pulling 70 hour weeks at work for about three weeks now- happiness and love are not my dominant emotions at the moment.

This list is in no order whatsoever. And, to be fair just for the last character- it's not all characters I hate, but sometimes characters I just expect a little more from. But mostly characters I hate :-)

1. Bella Swan and Edward Cullen - Gosh, these two make my blood boil. I went off against them in my Twilight review, I've gone off against them to anyone who makes an off-handed remark to me (and then completely regretted it, I'm sure), and I'll probably go off about them again several times. I just really strongly dislike them. Edward is possessive and obsessive and much, much older than Bella. (And seriously, he shines in the sun? Give me a break. The guy is not a god, he's a vampire.) Bella is just a twit. The girl has no backbone, no sense of balance, and no grasp on reality. Putting the two together, you do not get earth-shattering romance, you get a possessive and unbalanced glowstick (probably on acid at a rave). I can't even count them as two people because they are so wrapped up together in my mind. Anyone who cannot even be imagined without the company of another person is sad and unmemorable.

2. Katelina van Borselen - Dorothy Dunnett writes dense and sometimes cryptic prose in her two great series, The House of Niccolo and The Lymond Chronicles. While I am not as obsessed with these books as other people are, the characters do invite very strong reactions. And I have a very strong reaction to two of the females in the book (see next entry). Katelina is from the Niccolo series. She is the sort of girl who you "meet" in reading and wonder exactly how she sees situations; how can things possibly become so warped in her mind? She is completely self-absorbed and also delusional. Believe me- these two traits are really not good in tandem. Thoughts in her head must go something like, "I'm so pretty, every guy wants me. Even when they say they do not want me, they want me. Even if they ignore me, they are just pretending that they don't want me. Even if I seduce them and then they drop me, they still want me. And I will make them all realize how much they want me. And then I will hate them. Because that is how warped I am." Cow.

3. Oonagh O'Dwyer - From Dunnett's Lymond Chronicles this time. Honestly, Dunnett writes great males, but her females just suffer completely by comparison (as do most authors' females, to be fair. But hers to a greater extent). Oonagh has man hands, for one. That's weird. She's also depressing and fatalistic. A Debbie Downer, if you will. She gets herself into a complicated and bad situation and decides to just run away instead of dealing with it. Seriously, woman. Man up, if you don't mind my turn of phrase.

4. Guinevere - Yes, I wrote her up in my Rosie's Riveters post. Yes, she still sucks.

5. Catelyn - From George R. R. Martin's Song of Ice and Fire series. Um, how psychotic is this woman? It's like bizarre and misdirected Dawn of the Undead with her. I understand that it can be slightly awkward to face life as a zombie with a very inconvenient slit in your throat, but no need to kill every possible person you see as an enemy because of it. Calm down!

6. Leonie - From Georgette Heyer's These Old Shades. This girl is such a "Mary Sue." She's the most annoying person in the whole book, feeling a need to describe everyone around her as a barn animal, and somehow she gets this frightening older (much older) man to fall in love with her. Besides reeking of a Daddy complex, this just doesn't do it for me. Leonie was unworthy of Avon (though he wasn't such a great person, either, in my view), and undeserving of all the praise people kept piling on her. Also, this book irked me in general with the way Heyer used the whole Princess and the Pea mentality- as though it's in our blood to be either an aristocrat or a peasant. Though really, I guess all aristocrats thought that!

7. Heathcliff, from Wuthering Heights - It's quite likely Edward Cullen descends directly from Heathcliff (or, depending on Edward's age, it may be the other way around). Unhealthy obsession, and really cruel in the bargain. Talk about a sore loser.

8. Yudhishtira, from the Mahabharata - Most people are probably unfamiliar with Hindu mythology, but Yudhishtira always gets on my nerves. He's quite righteous and injured-party-ish for someone who was willing to sell his wife and his brothers at the gambling table, much less his kingdom. Control yourself, buddy. Maybe that way, you won't be the cause of death of practically every man on earth.

9. Maia, from the Falco series by Lindsey Davis - She's apparently Falco's favorite sister, but I certainly don't know why. She's loud and brash and mean and I will be very, very upset if she ends up happily ever after with a certain someone...

10. This is actually a huge surprise to me, but I think the seventh book took me over the edge with this character. I loved him in the first part of the series, when he had the best lines and was funny and sweet and supportive. But then he became all teenager-like, with his inferiority complex and temper tantrums and jealousy... Ron Weasley, here's hoping that you straighten yourself out after high school and become worthy of Hermione Granger. She doesn't need to put up with your crap.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Rosie's Riveters: Bellezza & Princess Diana

Rosie's Riveters is a weekly posting written by Booklust readers about riveting females in literature. Many readers have strong reactions to the women in the books they read- either very positive or very negative. These are the characters we find riveting, for good reasons or bad ones, and they form the population of Rosie's Riveters. Through this weekly post, we can discuss females we love to hate, or love to love. And maybe, just maybe- we can determine why we react so strongly to them.

If you are interested in participating, please comment on this post or e-mail me and I'll add you to the line-up!

This week's post is from Bellezza, of Dolce Bellezza. I only recently became Blog Buddies with Bellezza through Kailana's Friday Friends series, from where I clicked through to Bellezza's blog. And I'm so glad I did. It's lovely!

Who is your Riveter?

Diana Spencer Windsor, Princess of Wales, The People’s Prince, once Her Royal Highness before the letters were stripped away from her.

What book does she feature in?

The Diana Chronicles by Tina Brown.

Do you love her or hate her?

It is not possible to choose between love or hate toward the Princess. I would have to choose between love and pity. Diana stole the world’s heart with her innocent sweetness when she was just a young bride in the 1980’s. She became an icon of fashion in the 1990’s and a powerful humanitarian with incredible influence in the 2000’s. But, she never got what she truly wanted: a husband who loved her.

Describe her personality- how would you describe her to a friend?

Diana appeared to have such a juxtaposition of personalities. At one moment, she was flamboyant and loud, in another she could be seen as shy and demure. The overwhelming opinion of her seems to be one of awe that she was able to affect so many with her ability to connect to others. Her compassion, and her willingness to be human by showing real emotion, were her standout qualities.

Can you compare her to a celebrity?

Of course, Diana was a celebrity. Some say that she bridged celebrity and royalty perfectly.

What makes her riveting?

There are so many qualities that make Diana riveting: beauty, compassion, elegance, defiance, a magical connection with the media and camera that brought her into the lives of people worldwide. Personally, I was riveted by Diana the first time I saw her because we were the same age (minus six months). Her life seemed that much closer to mine because I, too, was a young woman about to be married. Yet, the glamour and the beauty that she possessed were quite bewildering. I consider her to be on a parallel with Jacqueline Kennedy because the ability to be charming, beautiful and so loved by others is not one that can be taught, only innately acquired.

What do you most admire/despise about her?

I most admire her honesty. It would have been easy to keep an image of perfection, to buckle under the expectations of The Firm (as Brown calls the Royal family). It would have been easy to hide her bulimia, pain at Charles’ consuming love for Camilla, or desires for her way to run her own life. But, Diana boldly, and perhaps in some ways unwisely, stepped up to being transparent. I think that’s a very brave thing for someone to do, especially a woman in her position.

Would you recommend reading the book in which the Riveter features?

Unequivocally. Normally, I do not reach for nonfiction as my favorite genre. But, Tina Brown’s writing is so piercing, and her wealth of knowledge is so extensive, that I could not put this biography down. It is without a doubt the best coverage of Diana that I have ever read.

Any parting remarks?

Thank you for hosting this wonderful meme, Booklust! It’s so fantastic to have women’s lives examined in detail through literature or biography. I am immensely interested in hearing about how others have chosen to live their lives.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Review: The Tsar's Dwarf

Title: The Tsar's Dwarf

Author: Peter F. Fogtdal, trans. Tiina Nunnally

Publisher: Hawthorne Books

# of Pages: 286

I received this book for free to review.

I did not finish reading this book.


Product Description
Soerine, a deformed female dwarf from Denmark, is given as a gift to Tsar Peter the Great, who is smitten by her freakishness and intellect. Against her will, the Tsar takes Soerine to St. Petersburg, where she becomes a jester in his court. There, she lives a life that both compels and repels her. Soerine eventually gives in to the attentions of Lukas, the Tsar’s favorite dwarf, and carves out an existence for herself amidst the squalor and lice-ridden world of dwarfs in the early 18th century. In this inhospitable milieu, Soerine’s intelligence and detached wit provide her some small measure of protection — until disaster strikes in the shape of a priest who wants to “save” her.

I waited some time to write the review of this book because I wasn't sure if it would be a DNF or not. The author e-mailed me multiple times, assuring me that I would love it if I'd only accept a copy to review, that once I received it, I would drop all other books to read this one.

That isn't exactly how it played out, but I admit that Fogtdal's gumption certainly intrigued me. So I picked the book up to read. It's a very nicely-made book. It has very bright white pages, so the text stands out and is easy to read. It has front and back flaps so that you don't need a bookmark, but can mark your page with the bookcover itself. It is also a good size- very easy to carry.

The story, though, didn't catch my attention in the way I thought it would. It centers around a 17th century Danish dwarf, Sorine, who is quite cynical in her view of the world due to the horrible way she has been treated her whole life. We spend the entirety of the book (well, at least the first 120 pages that I read) in her head, which is not a very pleasant place. She is haunted by ghosts from her past and she has a pretty large chip on her shoulder. But she is still, somehow, sympathetic.

I'm not really sure why I can't finish this book. But every time I picked it up to read, I tried to find something else to do instead. I would stare at the same page for minutes. I felt like the story involved a lot of people with names I couldn't pronounce and I couldn't keep them straight in my head. Also, I know very little about the history of Denmark and Russia, so the historical context was confusing for me, too. While Sorine is a compelling and interesting character, I didn't much care for anyone else in the novel.

So really- I think maybe if I felt more invested in the story, then I would have been able to finish it. If I felt that I cared for the characters or engaged in the plot, then maybe I'd go on. But... I just don't, and I am not one to force my way through a book that I don't really enjoy. I do think that others could very likely enjoy this one, though, so if the story premise interests you- give it a whirl :-)

Today Kate Grenville's The Lieuetenant came for me to review from Amazon. I was absolutely blown away by her book The Secret River, so I am moving on to the next book on my list to read.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Rosie's Riveters: Courtney & Scarlet O'Hara

Rosie's Riveters is a weekly posting written by Booklust readers about riveting females in literature. Many readers have strong reactions to the women in the books they read- either very positive or very negative. These are the characters we find riveting, for good reasons or bad ones, and they form the population of Rosie's Riveters. Through this weekly post, we can discuss females we love to hate, or love to love. And maybe, just maybe- we can determine why we react so strongly to them.

If you are interested in participating, please comment on this post or e-mail me and I'll add you to the line-up!

This week's post is by Courtney, over at Once Upon a Bookshelf. I did not know Courtney until she contacted me to guest post, but she won me over with her "Midweek Morsels" weekly post over at her blog. Food and books go great together (and with wine, I might add), and anyone who understands this concept understands me pretty well, too. So- go on over to Courtney's blog and enjoy her recipes and reviews.

Who is your Riveter?
Scarlett O'Hara

What book does she feature in?

Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind (Originally published in 1936)


Do you love her or hate her?

Positive
ly hate.

Describe her personality- how would you describe her to a friend?

"She knows what she wants, and doesn't let anyone or anything stand in the way of getting what she wants - even if it means hurting her family and friends in order to get it."

Can you compare her to a celebrity?

I can't think of one specific celebrity, but she reminds me of your
stereotypical reality game show contestant.

What makes her riveting?

She fights for what she wants, and that kind of strength and determination aren't always found in female characters. She can be resourceful and has a strong head for business in a time when that wasn't the norm for women. She also rarely gives up on what she believes she really wants.

But she uses back-handed means to get her way, and it can be so infuriating to see someone be so selfish that they would sacrifice the happiness of a member of their own family so that she herself can be taken care of. It can also be infuriating that she doesn't see what the people around her are really like - she has these almost romanticized ideas about certain people (such as Ashley) that don't coincide with reality.

What do you most admire/despise about her?

She is extremely selfish and has no real scruples. She purposely made her
sister's fiancee think that her sister was no longer in love with her, so that she could marry him instead, just so she would not be poor any longer. She never thinks about how her actions affect other people - and in one occasion it kills her husband and injures Ashley.

Then there is the whole Ashley/Melanie thing. She believes that she is in
love with Ashley so much that she doesn't see what she already has until it's too late. And she begrudges Melanie, even though Melanie is the sweetest girl, who thinks the world of Scarlett, would do anything for her, and stands by her when the rest of the world wants to shun Scarlett.

Would you recommend reading the book in which the Riveter features?

Yes. Gone with the Wind is a classic for a reason - it gives us a picture
of what life was like in a very important part of American history. There are some wonderfully strong characters in it and it is a fabulous story that gives us a picture of what things were like in a period we never would've lived through ourselves.

Any parting remarks?
While I loath Scarlett, I also have some respect for the tenacity she shows
for getting what she really wants - just not the way she goes about getting it.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Review: Baking Cakes in Kigali

Title: Baking Cakes in Kigali

Author: Gaile Parkin

Publisher: Delacorte Press

# of Pages: 308

Rating: 6/10

Favorite Line: But she did not understand how it could be important to learn the name of every single star in the sky; surely it was better to know the name of every person in your street?

This review is based on an advance reader's edition.

Product Description
Meet Angel Tungaraza, professional cake-baker, amateur matchmaker, an ear to listen and a shoulder to cry on. A uniquely charming, funny and touching novel of life, life and food set in Rwanda, a country recovers from unimaginable terror and violence. Angel Tungazara has recently moved to Rwanda from her native Tanzania. With her husband, Pius, and the five orphaned children of their late son and daughter, she is hardly short of things to do. But she still finds time to pursue her hobby and her passion, her small but increasingly successful business, baking individually-designed cakes for the parties and celebrations of her neighbours and their friends. Angel is entirely aware that many of the Rwandans around her have witnessed and survived horrors she can barely imagine. But she also knows that their lives continue, that they also have reasons to celebrate, to be joyous and to be happy. As she gets to know her neighbours and as they tell her their stories, she comes to realise how much each of them has to mourn as well as how much they have to celebrate. And, finally, she comes to accept how much that is true of her too.

I don't quite know what to make of this book. It has a really beautiful theme of celebrating small victories after surviving horrible situations. It also does a brilliant job of describing the AIDS crisis in Africa in a very moving way. The author, Gaile Parkin, does not throw statistics in your face. Rather, she quietly describes how people in Africa- everyone in Africa- is affected by AIDS, even in just the tiniest of ways. Almost every character in the book has a family member with AIDS, and the way each person has adapted to living with the disease makes for compelling and moving reading.

At the same time, though, I don't think the writing style was all that great. I am not sure if the author wanted to achieve a very particular style, but I found the storytelling language a bit stilted and awkward at times. It was fun to read the different dialects and mannerisms of Rwandans, but it could also get tiring when conversations would consist of saying, "Eh," and "Uh-uh" about ten times. Maybe those phrases are used a lot in Rwanda, but it can get annoying to read them so many times in a book. And sometimes the way people talked seemed very structured- as though the author were using the same phrases over and over in the way that a young author might, rather than one who has a full command of vocabulary. I have a feeling that this was all done for stylistic purposes; if that is the case, though, I think it could have been done in a cleaner manner.

There isn't really a plot to this book- there are just vignettes, basically, of everyday life in Kigali, Rwanda. The book progressese chronologically, but it could have just as easily been told in a short story format. I can't really say that there was rising action or a climax or falling action. There was just... activity. But it was a really nicely put-together way of reading about very serious topics such as AIDS and genocide, and how it affects the lives of people living in Rwanda. If you want a gut-wrenching and tissue-requiring read for those sorts of topics, steer clear. But if you'd like to read a book about how people survive such things, and adapt their lives around them, then this is the story for you.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Review: The Red Necklace

Title: The Red Necklace

Author: Sally Gardner

Publisher: Orion Books

# of Pages: 374

Favorite Line: He had a large, needy, greedy face that gathered itself into a weak, undefined chin and had about it the promise of perpetual disappointment.

Rating: 9/10

From Booklist
*Starred Review* A Gypsy boy, Yann, and the dwarf who has raised him are caught up in drama on and off the stage, where they work with a magician and his automaton. Outside their Parisian theater, revolution is beginning to boil. Inside, the magician is murdered by the villainous Count Kallovski, who has Yann in his sights as well. So begins a finely crafted tale that crosses years and crisscrosses countries, as Yann becomes a young man with a mission: to save the lovely Sido from her heartless father, even as he struggles with the extraordinary gifts bestowed upon him by his Gypsy heritage. If the success of historical fiction depends on how well setting and story mesh, this is a very successful book, indeed. Gardner sweeps readers into a turbulent time, dissecting eighteenth-century French society and the evolution of the revolution, from a yearning for liberty to a chaotic bloodbath. The history becomes personal when seen through the eyes of an astoundingly rich, carefully drawn cast, whose lives are interwoven like pieces of string in an elaborate cat’s cradle. Scores are waiting to be settled on every page; this is a heart-stopper. Grades 9-12. --Ilene Cooper

Honestly, I don't think many other books could be so well-designed to be right up my alley. This book is what I dub "historical fantasy," and it is great! I think the French Revolution is a fascinating (and terrifying) period in history, and it lends itself to novels and fantasy really well. I have often mulled over the thought of starting a reading challenge that centers around the Revolution because it's just such a rich period of history. If I decide to go forward with one, I hope a lot of people choose to read this book. And, wonderfully, there's a sequel coming out later this year- The Silver Blade.

The Red Necklace (I really feel the title The Scarlet Necklace would have been better. Red sounds a bit blase, but that is a minor quibble.) is a really riveting young adult fantasy novel that focuses on a French boy of gypsy origins, Yann, who has magical abilities to move things and read people's minds. It also features a young aristocrat woman (beautiful, of course), Sido, who is trying to escape marriage to a vile, older man who excellently reinvents himself with each change in the political climate of France. The characters are all very richly-drawn and engaging. The story gets a bit bogged down in itself a couple of times, but generally moves at a clipping pace.

I really like the way Sally Gardner set up the story, too- showing different sides of the conflict. The French Revolution was certainly a long time coming, but she shows every side of the bloody mess objectively. Sido is an aristocrat whose servants love and defend her; her father is one who is held up as a symbol of aristocratic gluttony. Their servants are eager and excited by the revolution, but there are others that are horrifyingly taken over by the mob mentality. I also liked the bonus of Yann and his mentor being of gypsy background. It added another nuance to the story without overpowering it. I am excited to see how that backstory develops. There is also a somewhat Star Wars-esque plotline introduced near the end, but I won't get into that one- don't want to ruin the read for anyone else.

All in all, a really fun and interesting read. Highly recommended if you like fantasy or historical fiction. Young adult fantasy is definitely where it's at these days :-)

PS- And how fortuitous that I read and finished this book just in time for Bastille Day!

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Rosie's Riveters: Eva & Anne Shirley

Rosie's Riveters is a weekly posting written by Booklust readers about riveting females in literature. Many readers have strong reactions to the women in the books they read- either very positive or very negative. These are the characters we find riveting, for good reasons or bad ones, and they form the population of Rosie's Riveters. Through this weekly post, we can discuss females we love to hate, or love to love. And maybe, just maybe- we can determine why we react so strongly to them.

If you are interested in participating, please comment on this post and I'll add you to the line-up!

This week's post is from Eva, whom many of you know already from her excellent blog, A Striped Armchair. Eva is one of my new(er) book buddies, though we seem to have similar taste in books. This is exemplified by Eva choosing Anne Shirley as her Rosie Riveter, a character I grew up adoring. Eva reads and reviews a very wide array of books on her blog- all of which tend to end up on my wish list!

And here is Eva's post:

Who is your Riveter?

Anne Shirley. I spent a long time trying to think of a less obvious
choice, but I just kept coming back to her!

What book does she feature in?

She's in a series by L.M. Montogomery. The first book is Anne of
Green Gables. We see her grow from childhood to adulthood and become a mother.

Do you love her or hate her?

I adore her!


Describe her personality- how would you describe her to a friend?

I'd say she's a perfect friend: loyal and loving, funny and smart and
wonderful at imagining games and stories. But she also has a fast temper and can carry a grudge. :D

Can you compare her to a celebrity?

Not really!


What makes her riveting?
First of all, she's always having amusing adventures, which makes the
books fun. And it's wonderful to grow up with her, seeing her change and adapt to new challenges. But what makes her riveting is the combination of her wonderful way of seeing the world (she uses her imagination all of the time) and her striving to be a good person.

What do you most
admire/despise about her?
I admire her strength of character. Once she has decided what is
right or wrong, she'll abide by it even if it pains her. And she's very honest with herself and consequently others. Her devotion to family is wonderful, and ties into her strong sense of right-and-wrong. Also, once she's older, she's wonderful with children; I admire that as well. There's so much about her to admire!

Would you recommend reading the book in which the Riveter features?

Definitely! I've reread them all more than once and delight in them. :D


Any parting remarks?

This is a wonderful series and thanks for inciting me to take part! :)

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Review: The Texicans

Title: The Texicans

Author: Nina Vida

Publisher: Soho Press

# of Pages: 396

Favorite Line: "You have to think on what we do today and whether we do it right. That's all we can do."

Rating: 7/10

I received this book for free to review.

From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. Vida's luminous, dramatic seventh novel finds Joseph Kimmel, a Missouri school teacher, heading to mid-19th-century Texas to claim his recently deceased brother's belongings; he's left for dead when his horse is stolen. Across the plains, after her Texas Ranger husband dies fighting Comanches, Aurelia Ruiz takes refuge at a Comanche camp and adopts their ways. Henry Castro, a Frenchman with dreams of creating an Alsatian-immigrant–populated town in his own name, not only rescues Kimmel but marries him off to Katrin, an unattached white émigré whom a Comanche leader had espied and wanted for his own. The newlyweds head off to create a distinctive ranch, one that welcomes members of the Tonkaway tribe, Mexicans, escaped slaves, free African-Americans and others in distress. Affairs of the heart are never neglected in Vida's novels (Goodbye, Saigon, etc.), and Kimmel soon finds himself enraptured when he meets the beautiful Aurelia, just as a posse of xenophobic ranchers wreak havoc on the ranch. This radiant work of historical fiction—vibrantly atmospheric and emotionally dense—spans 12 years in the lives of many engaging characters, who come to life on every page.

I have never been a fan of Texas. It is a state that is really pretty full of itself and seems to think it's the greatest thing since sliced bed. It is also far too fond of the death penalty, in my opinion. But it certainly captures the imagination, especially when it comes to historical fiction. And it seems as though the author, Nina Vida, is smitten by the Lone Star State.

Vida, like most characters in her book, also knows how to go after what she wants. I don't know how many bloggers she contacted to read and review and give away her book, but it seems like in the past several weeks, The Texicans has shown up all over book blogs. Good for her :-) I'm glad it's getting attention as I think it's a deserving book.

The Texicans is not a happy book. None of the characters are content and I didn't sympathize with any of them. I felt sorry for them all but I didn't like any. It didn't particularly seem as though any of them liked each other, either. They would have conversations and just not listen to each other- one would be talking on one subject, and the other would be talking about something completely different. It was sad. What a lonely way to live. I suppose, living on the Texas frontier, one would have to get used to loneliness. And how many of us have conversations with people and don't really pay attention to what the other person is saying? Probably more of us than would like to admit it.

I guess I would say that the main character of the book is Joseph Kimmel, but the character who drives the book is Aurelia. She is, however, not in the book nearly as much as the other characters, except at the beginning. As I have often mentioned before, and will undoubtedly do again, I do not like books in which there is a femme fatale type of woman with whom every man falls promptly in love (or in lust or whatever) for no understandable reason. Aurelia is one of these women. It must be tiring being her, always upsetting people's lives. She is a mystery to me- I never fully understood what made her the person she was, or what she was thinking or how she felt about anyone. I never got any sense of her feelings for other people. I don't even know if she had feelings. But she definitely sets the tone of the book.

This novel reminded me a lot of Kate Grenville's The Secret River, one of my favorite books. Both are about settlers in a harsh area of the world, and the way that life on the frontier can shape a person. Both books are much more about character development than about plot. Vida meticulously shows us how a man can become wonderfully successful but still be unhappy. She paints a picture for us of a woman who survives a horrible experience and is never the same afterwards. And, most painfully, she shows how people who are so close to each other, living in the same house, can be almost complete strangers.

Personally, I didn't like the ending of the book. I found the conclusion between Joseph and Katrin somewhat of an anticlimax. I also wasn't a fan of the way Vida ended Aurelia's story. I think we would have been better off as readers without the epilogue-type of chapter at the end of the book.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Review: The Devil's Company

Title: The Devil's Company

Author: David Liss

Publisher: Random House

# of Pages: 369

Rating: 8/10

I received this book for free to review.

Product Description
From the acclaimed author of
The Whiskey Rebels and A Conspiracy of Paper comes a superb new historical thriller set in the splendor and squalor of eighteenth-century London. In Benjamin Weaver, David Liss has created one of fiction’s most enthralling characters. The year is 1722. Ruffian for hire, ex-boxer, and master of disguise, Weaver finds himself caught in a deadly game of cat and mouse, pitted against Jerome Cobb, a wealthy and mysterious schemer who needs Weaver’s strength and guile for his own treacherous plans. Weaver is blackmailed into stealing documents from England’s most heavily guarded estate, the headquarters of the ruthless British East India Company, but the theft of corporate secrets is only the first move in a daring conspiracy within the eighteenth century’s most powerful corporation. To save his friends and family from Cobb’s reach, Weaver must infiltrate the Company, navigate its warring factions, and uncover a secret plot of corporate rivals, foreign spies, and government operatives. With millions of pounds and the security of the nation at stake, Weaver will find himself in a labyrinth of hidden agendas, daring enemies, and unexpected allies.

So, here I am back in Georgian England! How comforting to be home once again :-) I thoroughly enjoyed David Liss's previous books featuring Benjamin Weaver, a Jewish ex-boxer making his way as a detective in London. (And yes, I mention the religion for a reason. Judaism is part of all Liss's novels historical novels, and while it is never at the forefront of the plot, it is definitely a key component of the background.) I admit I don't remember the first two very well at all- I read them some years ago- but I do remember liking them. So I was really excited to get this book through LibraryThing's Early Reviewers program, and I wasn't disappointed at all.

David Liss, the author, is studying to get his PhD in history, and this comes through in his books. They are all very well-researched. He knows early 18th century England well, from London's neighborhoods to the political maneuverings of the East India Company. He is also very realistic in his portrayal of characters. He does notgive his characters modern sensibilities. I really appreciate that in a historical novel because frankly, that's the point of reading them. I don't need to read about 18th century London if everyone populating the book's pages has the same thought process that I do.

Some say that Liss gets a bit bogged down in the background research and presents too much of it in his stories to be interesting. I admit that at times, there is a lot of political talk, but personally, I'm a fan. However, this is my favorite period in history, so I could be a bit biased.

One thing that did seem to ring false, though, was the East India Company corporate slant. I understand that the East India Company was the first multi-national corporation, really, complete with stockholders. I also understand that the directors of the firm, and people further down the ladder, were very ruthless in their methods to get as much profit as possible. However, I do think that Liss put a slightly too modern slant on the way everyone reacted to the company in the book. It was pretty clear to me that Liss was writing to an audience that is currently going through a global recession in which corporate greed featured prominently. It's all well to assume people now should know about corporate responsibility and the effects capitalism can have in many sectors. But I don't quite buy into the way everyone in 1722 seemed just to know what would happen to the East India Company, Britain, and the world, when it was the first-ever corporation.

That concern didn't hamper my enjoyment of the novel, though. It is fast-paced, populated with interesting characters, and fun to read. Another historical mystery winner.

Friday, July 3, 2009

Rosie's Riveters: Marg & Eleanor of Aquitaine


Rosie's Riveters is a weekly posting written by Booklust readers about riveting females in literature. Many readers have strong reactions to the women in the books they read- either very positive or very negative. These are the characters we find riveting, for good reasons or bad ones, and they form the population of Rosie's Riveters. Through this weekly post, we can discuss females we love to hate, or love to love. And maybe, just maybe- we can determine why we react so strongly to them.

This week's post (the first guest post!) is from a long-time book friend, Marg, who writes over at Reading Adventures. Marg and I "met" on the Historical Fiction forum- I think that is the forum that got me into blogging, way back when, so she is one of the forces behind this blog! Marg hails from Australia, and she reads a lot of historical fiction, mysteries and romance novels, some with a more fantastical element as well. Clearly we'd be friends, based on our book tastes! I highly recommend her blog.

And now, without further ado- here is Marg's excellent post:

Who is your Riveter?

One of my great loves, genre wise, is Historical Fiction, and so for this week's Rosie's Rive
ters, I have looked to the past, and chosen the formidable Eleanor of Aquitaine.

What book does she feature in?

My early introductions to Eleanor were in Sharon Penman's excellent novels. There is a particular focus on her relationship with Henry II in the trilogy that starts with When Christ and His Saints Slept, and then continues with Time and Chance and then Devil's Brood. In addition she is one of the supporting characters in the Justin de Quincey mystery series.

Sharon Penman is not the only author to feature Eleanor to some degree. Even when she is just a supporting character any mention of her will capture my attention. Other books that she has appeared in that I have read include the historical mystery The Serpent's Tale by Ariana Franklin and also in Elizabeth Chadwick's excellent William Marshal novels, particularly The Greatest Knight.

Other authors to have written about her include Jean Plaidy, Judith Tarr, and Margaret Ball, and there is plenty of non-fiction written about her as well.

Do you love her or hate her?

Love her!

Describe her personality- how would you describe her to a friend?

I think that my impression of Eleanor of Aquitaine is of a woman who was beautiful, but also powerful and driven. Other adjectives I might use are passionate, political, single minded and formidable.

Can you compare her to a celebrity?

The only name that came to mind was Susan Sarandon, which seems strange given that she isn't royal or anything like that. I guess the comparison comes from the fact that Susan Sarandon has chosen to go against what might have been considered the societal norms of the day by living with a much younger man, not really giving a damn what anyone thinks, and being passionately involved in the causes that she chooses to get involved in.


What makes her riveting?

Eleanor of Aquitaine is riveting to me because she was a powerful woman in her own right, who married two powerful men, was queen of two countries, and was mother to two kings. She was apparently a great beauty of her time and lived an adventurous and tumultuous life.

She was queen of France until she divorced Louis VII. Not long after she married Henry II with whom it would appear she had a very passionate union, both when they were happy, and when they were passionately against each other. With Louis she had two daughters, and with Henry she had five sons and three daughters. Two of those sons would go on to become King of England, Richard the Lionheart and King John and Eleanor acted as regent for a time for Richard while he was on crusade. Eleanor herself had gone to Jerusalem with her then husband Louis VII during the second crusade.

For a long time Eleanor was imprisoned by Henry for aiding their son in a rebellion against Henry and was released only for limited periods of time.

What do you most admire/despise about her?

From this distance it is probably hard to know what Eleanor was truly like, but she is certainly a woman who left her mark on history when so many women were defined by their marriage and many were just footnotes in the notes. She managed to hold onto her lands, managed to get out of an unhappy marriage during a time when divorce was very difficult, and managed to leave a lasting impression through the ages.

If there is one thing that I would say that isn't a point in her favour it is that it appears that Eleanor wasn't the most maternal of women, although when you look through the family history, it appears that being a Plantagenet was to be quite a volatile character. I remember reading a quote once, but I can't remember who said it, something along the lines of "if you want to read about dysfunctional families, look no further than the Plantagenets".

Would you recommend reading the book in which the Riveter features?

I would absolutely recommend reading any of the books that I mentioned above, not only because Eleanor features in them, but also because they are excellent books in their own right.

Any parting remarks?

My image of Eleanor of Aquitaine has I think been irrevocably influenced by the experience of watching a movie from 1968 called Lion in Winter. Katharine Hepburn won an Oscar for her performance as Eleanor and other cast members included Peter O'Toole and a couple of young actors called Anthony Hopkins and Timothy Dalton.

I thought I would close this post by sharing a Youtube video of Katharine Hepburn as Eleanor of Aquitaine. The film is set in Chinon at Christmas in 1183. Eleanor has been released from prison for the holidays, and the whole family is involved in scheming and plotting, and maneuvering to be the next person to wear the crown.



Thanks so much Aarti for coming up with a great idea and letting me play along. I hope that you find Eleanor of Aquitaine a worth recipient of the Rosie's Riveters treatment!



Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Review: Between the Assassinations

Title: Between the Assassinations

Author: Aravind Adiga

Publisher: Free Press

# of Pages: 338

Favorite Line: She lay in the storage room, seeking comfort in the fumes of the DDT and the sight of the Baby Krishna's silver buttocks.

Rating: 10/10

I received this book for free to review.

From Booklist
Adiga provides both a chronological and geographical framework for this collection of stories, a prequel to his Man Booker–winning The White Tiger (2008). The stories take place during the years between the assassinations of Indira Gandhi in 1984 and Rajiv Gandhi in 1991. Each story is introduced by an excerpt from a guide for a weeklong tour of the fictional city of Kittur, located on India’s southwestern coast. The blandness of the travel guide is a counterpoint to the vibrant, messy city life, where Hindu, Muslim, and Christian, high and low caste, rich and poor, all jostle together. As in The White Tiger, corruption and injustice are important themes, and while a few characters find ways to strike back, most are caught in the daily grind of trying to survive. Although sometimes heavy handed, the stories are sharply tactile, and the city of Kittur is richly imagined. Once again, Adiga offers a panoramic view of India, this time by giving voices and names to the multitude. --Mary Ellen Quinn

I have had so much luck with short stories lately that I couldn't resist requesting this book from Amazon Vine- and success once again! This is obviously a genre I really need to delve into more deeply. Short stories are great reads for the morning and evening commutes, and during a lunch-for-one. There isn't quite as great an urge to read just one more chapter as there is with novels, so you can place your bookmark with a content feeling of completion before opening the book once more.

I thoroughly enjoyed this collection of stories. I admit to being slightly biased, though. First, it takes place not only in India, but in South India. Not only in South India, but in Karnataka, the state my parents are from. There is a character in the book named Sulocha, which is the name of one my dad's sisters. There is another one (or several different ones- I can't quite tell if they're all the same person in different stories) named Thimma- this is the nickname my mom has for my brother. The cities of Bangalore and Mysore are mentioned, as are yummy foods like tomato saaru, idli and dosa.

I really enjoy reading Indian books because it's such a vivid setting for me- while historical fiction and fantasy will always be my genres of choice, there is a huge disconnect between those characters' lives and mine. Stories set in India, especially in the south, are like a jolt of caffeine- I wonder sometimes what my life would have been like, if my parents hadn't moved to the US in the 1970s. Reading stories like these definitely gives me a sense of what might have been.

Indian authors have a tendency to be depressing. Adiga is no exception. His stories are painfully bleak and morose. His characters face life with the fatalistic belief that nothing will ever change for them. They are stuck where they are, with no way out. Some are angry, some are resigned, and some (very few) are hopeful in tone. But the main character, throughout all the stories, is India, in all her guts and glory. While I enjoyed some stories in this collection more than others, they all moved me in some way. The characters are vivid, true and wonderfully three-dimensional for the forty or so pages they are given.

And the language is so lush- Kittur, India really comes to life- the sights and sounds, the tastes and smells. Some of the sentences just struck a chord. In addition to the one above, I also noted, "The centerpiece of his body was a massive potbelly, a hard knot of flesh pregnant with a dozen cardiac arrests." And, "...the furrow in his brow was like a bookmark left there by the dead woman." So much fun to read a whole book full of sentences like these. It is hard to pick a favorite story, but one that is close to my heart is the one about a bootleg bookseller named Xerox. Read it, and you'll know why :-)